The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days.
The bar chart illustrates the cinema had visited by citizens of one European country on different days of a week in the year 2003,2005 and 2007. The data is in the percentage.
Overall, it is seen clearly from the given bar graph that the percentage of visitors at cinemas was the highest on weekends than weekdays for all years.
To comments with, nearly 10% of citizens had been visited theatres on Monday in 2003, which experienced decrement on Wednesday and Thursday (below 5% for each), after rose nearly a two-fold on Tuesday. In addition, the trend of visitors in 2003 increased dramatically on the weekend over an average of 40%. Moreover, in the year 2005, the proportion of consumers at cinemas comprised over 30% on the weekend, which was around two times more than on weekdays.
Furthermore, the initial figure of humans, who visited cinemas in 2007 accounted for approximately 12% on Monday and Wednesday, which was 5% higher than Thursday, while the ratio of Tuesday, Friday, Saturday, and Sunday was close to 17%, 30%, 42%, and 32% respectively in the same year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-09 | rajpatel90 | 78 | view |
| 2020-02-18 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 78 | view |
| 2020-02-18 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
- The table below shows the percentage participation of women in senior management in three companies between 1975 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is it the case What can be done to attract local people to visit these places 78
- Some people think universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject Others believe that this is an unacceptable policy Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Most of the world s problems are caused by overpopulation Do you agree or disagree 56
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and 32% respectively in the same year.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93989071038 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71364161537 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628415300546 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.1118796009 43.030603864 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.142857143 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13126300318 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630420178568 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920040591924 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101881762775 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0943604987087 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.