The chart below gives information about birth and death rates in Switzerland from 1970 to 2020.
The bar chart compares the rates of birth and death in Switzerland from 1970 with predictions to 2020.
Overall, it is evident that there was a substantial rise in the figure for birth rate, while Switzerland saw a slight decrease in the death rate from 1970 to 2010. These trends are predicted to continue in the future.
Looking at the details, the number of people dying increased by 0.5 million from 1 million in 1970 to 1.5 million in 1990, hitting a peak during the whole period in the past. Subsequently, the figure dropped gradually to around 1 million in 2010. Following this, the death rate is likely to fall moderately to about 0.8 million in 2020.
In terms of the birth rate, the figure started at approximately 1.3 million in 1970. At this point, this figure grew quickly to 3 million, which meant that it was far higher than the number of dead people in 2010. It is expected that this rate will continue to go up, reach a high of almost 3.3 million at the end of the given period.
- The table below highlights data on the number of travellers using three major British airports between 1998 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- In some countries, governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move to regional areas outside big cities.Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- The pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made. 73
- The chart below gives information about birth and death rates in Switzerland from 1970 to 2020 42
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re predicted to continue in the future. Looking at the details, the number of pe...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 823.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52197802198 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42145668588 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549450549451 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4071752556 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4444444444 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.22222222222 5.23603664747 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294716046722 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143421652611 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162432546505 0.0843802449381 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243912452346 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.16219986506 0.0819641961636 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.