The chart below gives information about Istanbul Promo plus sales in 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The chart below gives information about “Istanbul Promo plus” sales in 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given line graph illustrates the sale of Istanbul promo price throughout twelve months from january to December in year 2007. The units are measured in millions of turkish lira.

Overall, Istanbul promo plus experienced a high sale in the month of march and least in two months July and september. Otherwise, the fluctuations in the sale of promo plus are observed throughout the year 2007.

Going back to significant consideration, it is clear that there was rapid increase in the sale of Istanbul promo plus from 200 millions to 350 millions in the month of january, February and march respectively. After that, a sudden decrease is examined in the sale of promo plus around 120,00,000 turkey lira in four months. Moreover, it further climbed up to just over 200 millions in August before dipped at 120 millions in september. While in the remaining months, the sale of promo plus raised in October which remains levelled off until November and afterwards again raised to well under 200 millions in the last month of the year 2007.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (10 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-09-07 dorae 67 view
2024-07-31 trpg143 78 view
2024-04-30 tr_h.20 73 view
2024-04-30 tr_h.20 73 view
2024-01-16 honguyenlily 67 view
Essays by user preet1994 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e measured in millions of turkish lira. Overall, Istanbul promo plus experienced...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are observed throughout the year 2007. Going back to significant consideration,...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ira in four months. Moreover, it further climbed up to just over 200 millions in ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, well, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92613636364 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61822102835 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.177186051 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.375 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155844545536 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780622324988 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050534013997 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123549984498 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033234352623 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.