The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of the different age groups of the UK citizens spending money to charity in 1990 and 2010.
A glance at the chart indicates that while the two group donated most money to charity in 1990 and 2010 were people at the age of 36-50 and 51-65, respectively , people from 18 to 25 supported the least in the both years.
Now, getting back to the details, in 1990, there was 43% of the UK residents aged between 36-50 donated money to charity, followed by 35% of the 51-65 year-olds, in contrast, the percentage of 18-25 year-olds was just only 17%. The 26-35 and over 65 age group gave a quite similar amount of money which were 31% and 32%.
In 2010, there was nearly 40% of 51-65 year-olds donated to charity. The proportion of donators aged between 36-50 and those aged over 65 were exactly the same, at 35%. The percentage of the 26 to 35 age group was 24% which was about 3 times higher than donators aged 18-25.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-17 | Fenny Mahara | 61 | view |
| 2019-01-26 | damladogan | 11 | view |
| 2019-01-14 | MilanT | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-21 | peeradonn | 73 | view |
| 2018-10-12 | dutahi | 67 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down. Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals.Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion. 84
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison 67
- Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...the age of 36-50 and 51-65, respectively , people from 18 to 25 supported the leas...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 788.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50285714286 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31614772613 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0513439685 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.571428571 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175442959469 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097796192808 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500894246258 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135842818113 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381890552056 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.94 61.2550243902 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.