The chart below show reason why people go to work by bicycle and car.
The pie chart illustrate rationales behind cycling and driving by workers. Overall, it is noticeable that impact on health and less pollution is the major reasons why people go to work by bicycle and comfortability is the motive behind driving to working place.
The main reason why people cycling to work is because of health impact and less pollution, this account for less than a third for both reasons. Next, 15% choose to go to work by bicycle because of issue of parking space. No cost and faster than driving account for the least reason just 13% and 12%, respectively.
On driving to work, the larger proportion choose to go to work by driving because of convinence, this represent two-fifth of total proportion. Distance to work is the second reason why people drive to work 21%. Faster than cycling and need to carry thing to work both share the same proportion 14%. However, 11% of people who drive to work do it because it safer than cycling.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-10 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. It also predicts figures for 2025. 67
- Today, the high sale of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold.To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Some people believe that the presence and involvement of a man in homes have a huge role to play in sustaining the family.To what extent do you agree/disagree 73
- The pie charts show reason why people go to work by bicycle or car 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 798.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77844311377 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49864964068 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502994011976 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2950221457 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6666666667 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324304148847 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151821246875 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102849092761 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245391371553 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392600237136 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.