The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city center from 2003-2012.
The line chart presents the changes in levels in three different areas of crime namely burglary, car theft, and robbery in the center of Newport between 2003 and 2012. Overall, burglary was witnessed a downward trend in the rate of crime while robbery and car theft remained the same number despite some fluctuations.
Starting at nearly 3500 incidents of burglary, this figure increased to reach a peak at around 3700 in 2004 before experiencing a plunge to just 1300 incidents in 2008. In the next 4 years, this rate recovered and increased to nearly 1500 incidents. Having remained stable for 2 years at 2700, the rate of car theft suffered a significant decline to 2000 incidents in 2006. After, this rate fell gradually until to register the same number with the beginning.
In terms of robbery, the highest number of incidents are reached in 2005, at nearly 800. The cases of robbery went down to the lowest point in the next 3 years, at 500 incidents followed by a slight improvement to around 600 incidents in the end.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-11 | Đặng Luân | 93 | view |
| 2022-03-31 | Aditow Zahid | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-02 | diamondngtkc | 61 | view |
| 2021-12-21 | nganphuong05 | 79 | view |
| 2021-11-06 | Vuthungan | 73 | view |
- The table below gives information about changes in models of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 78
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 67
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 56
- The three charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1992 and 2001
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 375, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...cant decline to 2000 incidents in 2006. After, this rate fell gradually until to regi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent to around 600 incidents in the end.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79213483146 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56007851832 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578651685393 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6631374812 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.625 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.625 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109784192867 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545765353749 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133162852131 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0898500099576 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127067102661 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.