The chart below shows the percentage of young people at universities in six countries, in 2000 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given information is about the proportion of young demos at varsities in six nations, in 2000 and 2007, is depicted by rendered bar graph.
At the cursory glance of the graph, it is enough to make clear that, In Italy, UK and Poland the percentage of youth enrolled in universities increased over the time. However, In 2000, 38% of the Italian youth and 46% of the American youth studied at universities and both these kingdoms saw a rise of 14% and 6% respectively in the next seven years. Similarly, In the Poland the percentage of youth enrolled increased from 64% to 78%.
It is further evident that, Spain and Norway witnessed a small decline in the proportion of youth in universities. Nevertheless, In 2000, the proportion of Spanish youth is fell from 46% to 41% and in Norway the percentage decline between 66% and 65%. Beside this, the percentage of Finnish youth in universities remained same at 70%.
Overall, the most striking factor is emerge from the graph is that, Finland had the maximum proportion of youth enrolled in universities in 2000 while in 2007 the maximum percentage was from Poland. There was change in the proportion of youth studying in universities in all countries except Finland.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-05 | roopdeep | 85 | view |
| 2021-09-11 | Gurjinder kaur 01 | 81 | view |
| 2021-09-11 | Gurjinder kaur 01 | 56 | view |
- Some people believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should not have to pay tax to the state To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- A knowledge of maths is not important for most jobs nowdays To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 55
- Eating too much sugar is harmful for health Some people think that it is government responsibility to limit people s sugar consumption while others think that it is individual s responsibility to limit the amount of sugar they eat Discuss both views 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of young people at universities in six countries in 2000 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- The chart below shows the percentage of young people at universities in six countries in 2000 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, nevertheless, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87019230769 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82822690367 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504807692308 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8357739838 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.555555556 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177468583867 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837176904779 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051392747214 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123513279454 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415326806801 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.