The chart gives information on the percentage of women going into higher education in five countries for the years 1980 and 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart describes the proportion of female learners attending higher education in the UK, USA, Australia, South Korea, and France during 35 years, starting in 1980.
Overall, more and more women paid attention to higher education throughout the given period.
In general, after 35 years from 1980, there was a rapid increase in the number and the portion of female school-leavers attending higher educational courses. Apart from South Korea, all four remain countries witnessed a high percentage, which was over 50% in 2015. Both Australia and the USA reached the highest percentage, which is around 58% while the UK and France stood at the proportions of about 55% and 54% respectively, which were slightly lower.
Compared with the other countries, Australia remained unchangeable in the percentage of female school-leavers going into higher education during the period between 1980 and 2015. Furthermore, despite the slowest increase, South Korea witnessed the two-folded figure in 2015 when compared with that in 1980, which was exactly 30% and about 15% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-22 | bemoichoianhyeuem | view | |
| 2021-12-12 | dhananjaydeej | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-19 | mehak sandhu | 59 | view |
| 2021-09-01 | Audric | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | So Ri | 89 | view |
- Some people think that children perform better in a single sex school compared to a mixed school To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 69
- Having more money and less free time is better than earning less money and having more free time Discuss both views and state your opinion 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, so, while, apart from, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48520710059 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8374493226 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627218934911 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7964768532 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.428571429 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160446229034 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795153776615 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523279448572 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099965912314 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251535002035 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.