The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997
to 2010.
<span style="font-size: 24.2px;">The bar chart compares four nations, namely Australian, Sweden, Iceland and Turkey, in terms of the percentage of renewable power in the total energy production over the course of 13 years starting from 1997.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that Iceland and Sweden witnessed an upward trend in the use of renewable energy sources in the three years. Among the four countries, this type of energy was the most popular in Iceland.
In 1997, almost half of the total energy produced in Iceland came from renewable resources with around 45%, nine times higher than that of Sweden. In just three years, this figure went up strongly to 60% in 2000 and continued to climb steadily by about 10% in the last ten years. By contrast, the amount of renewable power produced in Sweden, which increased trivially at approximately 10% in 2010.
Regarding Australia, nearly 10% of the power supply was from renewable resources in 1997, compared to approximately 38% in Turkey. While this kind of energy in Australia decreased slightly to about 7%, the figures for Turkey rose slightly to over 40% in 2000. Over the following ten years, the rate of renewable sources in Australia and Turkey fell down roughly 5% and around 32%, respectively.</span><br>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-25 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 84 | view |
| 2018-11-17 | yaldaasgari | 91 | view |
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of plastics
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009.Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The charts show the percentage of income spent on food and other goods in 3 European countries from 1998 2008 78
- The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, regarding, so, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17061611374 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16643012447 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57345971564 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7289631963 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.222222222 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234991241682 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963819193726 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566360539558 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144443726018 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188267724111 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.