The chart shows the total number of minutes of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 to 2002
The bar chart describes trends in the popularity of different ways of phone communications over the span of 7 years.
Overall, the majority of people preferred using fixed line for local calls, though it became less popular by the end of observation period. By contrast, there was a noticeable increase in rings on fixed lines, both national and international, and in general usage of mobile phones.
The upward trend was settled by almost every type of telephony with the only exception in local calls on fixed line from 2000 to 2002, when total amount of minutes decreased to 71 billion by the end of observation period. Though, this way of communication remained the outlier, the gap between local calls on fixed line and other means of connection was shortened rapidly.
By contrast, the duration of mobile calls nearly doubled in 2000, compared to 1999, and kept on growing until it reached 45 billion. The same pattern was followed by national and international calls on fixed line. These increased from under 40 to more than 60 bullion in 1995 and 2002, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-09 | Trần Như Cát Tường | 95 | view |
| 2023-03-18 | nguyet141201 | view | |
| 2023-03-10 | calarasl | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-04 | giangngoc | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-30 | lattethuc | 56 | view |
- The reading passage states that there is a decline in reading the literature However the lecturer says that there no real decline 70
- The chart gives a more detailed look at changes in the consumption of such personal items as stereos tennis racquets perfumes CDs toys and photographic films in four selected European countries 78
- The maps show the development of the seaside resort of Templeton over the span of 15 years from 1990 to 2005 67
- The diagram illustrates the process of brick production 78
- The diagram below shows one method of manufacturing ceramic pots 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97790055249 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73802478213 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629834254144 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1339276024 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.625 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124826388215 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525371455946 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500059182492 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0693625344314 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516626033848 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.