The charts below illustrate the average bed use in three typical hospitals internationally and the proportion of hospital budgets allocated to in-patient care before and after day-surgery was introduced in 2003.
The diagrams provided illustrate the average number of patient beds utilizing in three international common hospitals and the percentage of hospital funds invested in in-patient care prior and after day-surgery was introduced in 2003.
Overall, there was an upward trend in the average number of beds using in hospitals. Also, a large proportion of hospital sums of money was allocated to other expenses.
Chinese hospital was using 70 patient beds in the first initial year, increasing slowly during from just below 80 beds in 1998 to about 90 beds in 2005, and finishing at above 90 in last year, while 60 patient beds were utilized in Ukrainian in 1997, and it experienced a small increase from 1998 to 2002 before levelling off at around 70 between 2003 and 2006. In contrast, French hospital employed the least number of patient beds in 1997 (around 40), increasing moderately since 1998 to 2003 and saw a small fall in 2004 before ending the period just above 40 patient beds.
Moving to pie charts, the majority of hospital financial funding was allocated to other expenses and it commenced at 65% in 2002, rising by 8% in the next following 4 years. However, 35% of the money was invested in in-patient care in the first initial year, cutting down to about 27% in 2006.
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010. 78
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualification in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held the in 1999. 61
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 50
- The chart shows unemployment rate and the number of people leaving Ireland from 1988 to 2008. 73
- In many countries, schools have severe problems with students behaviour.What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1072.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89497716895 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56720109562 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547945205479 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.8779136703 43.030603864 214% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 153.142857143 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2857142857 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431203105453 0.215688989381 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195486947828 0.103423049105 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133790455694 0.0843802449381 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274817258683 0.15604864568 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142075731236 0.0819641961636 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.