The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The first chart gives information about the reason for study among students in six age categories. The second one compares the amount of support gained from employers in the same groups.
It is clear that younger students choose to study mainly for their careers in the future, while the reason of older students is their interest. Also, younger employees can get more support.
Students under 39 consider careers to be the main reason. For those under 26 years old, 80% of them think they need to study for good jobs, whereas the figure for the reason about interest is only 10% in the same group. In the group of 40 to 49, approximately half of students think interest is the primary reason. By contrast, 70% of students over 49 study for interest.
In terms of the support in each age group, more than 30% of them can get time off and fees. Employees under 26 get the most support, and nearly 70% can be supported by employers, followed by the age group 26 to 29 (50%). The equivalent figures for age groups over 49, 40 to 49 and 30 to 39 are 45%, 38% and 35% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-28 | despair | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-12 | pqh2612002 | 61 | view |
| 2019-05-15 | Adewumi Akinwale | 11 | view |
| 2018-09-08 | Brian Loe | 61 | view |
| 2018-09-08 | Fthytrfr | 61 | view |
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age.Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?What sort of punishment should parents and t 61
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- "Ten years ago our company had two new office buildings constructed as regional headquarters for two regions. The buildings were erected by different construction companies — Alpha and Zeta. Although the two buildings had identical floor plans, the 89
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparis 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50253807107 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35931965609 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53807106599 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6629580555 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.6363636364 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9090909091 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54545454545 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308491737791 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121112003004 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578501597677 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193121883638 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500419653168 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.52 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.