The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007.

Essay topics:

The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007.

The two pie charts illustrate the information about the percentage of water consumption by 5 various sectors in Sydney, Australia in 2 years - 1997 and 2007.
Overall, it is clear that there was a minimal changes during the period shown on the charts. The proportion of water usage in food industry was highest in both years. Besides, there was a significant increase in service industry.
Building industry, manufacturing and service industry are three sector was decreased sightly over 10 years. Especially the water was used by food industry dropped by roughly 7%.
By contrast, these other sectors had increase. The water consumption in household had a slight go up by 3%. Also, the water usage in service industry rose double between 1997 and 2007 from 13% to 25%.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-11 faraj27 84 view
2019-11-25 Drragkloha 84 view
2019-10-15 khoavodoj 73 view
2019-09-03 Lucy_067 56 view
2019-08-22 BangLangTim 78 view
Essays by user fon2704 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'sector' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'sectors'.
Suggestion: sectors
...acturing and service industry are three sector was decreased sightly over 10 years. Es...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 646.0 965.302439024 67% => OK
No of words: 128.0 196.424390244 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.046875 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.36358566101 3.73543355544 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7231709672 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6640625 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 189.9 283.868780488 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3325453014 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.7777777778 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2222222222 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261088418889 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977644616029 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118906881477 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172602691066 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144983338864 0.0819641961636 177% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.