The pie chart gives information about, Australian school leavers in the year 1980, 1990 and 2000. Overall, the trend shows, employment and further education have major aspect after secondary education in Australia, with less interest towards unemployment.
During the year 1980 further education was at the priority which showed almost 50% of the whole share. However, this mode showed a sharp decrease to reaching about 38% and 37% in the year 1990 and 2000 respectively. On the contrary, employed people in 1980 were about 40% after leaving secondary school, but this inclination increased gradually over the years reaching about 50% in 1990 and 55% in 2000.
Regarding the unemployment aspect, this showed some fluctuations in the year's noted. Firstly, at about 10% in 1990 with slight increase in 1990 to about 12% with experiencing sudden dip to 8% reaching to its lowest of all in the year 2000.
- eltsliz.com/ielts-writing-task-1-line-graph-model-score-9/ 11
- The charts show the Australian school leavers did immediately after leaving secondary school. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The charts show the Australian school leavers did immediately after leaving secondary school. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 56
- It is believed that people who read a lot of novels have developed better imagination and language skills than people who prefer to watch TV.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Research indicates that the characteristics we are born with have much more influence on our personality and development than any experiences we may have in our life.Which do you consider to be the major influence? 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reased gradually over the years reaching about 50% in 1990 and 55% in 2000. R...
^^
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to its lowest of all in the year 2000.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, regarding, second, so, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 760.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 148.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13513513514 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48791127476 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66487034701 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608108108108 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7479841019 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.571428571 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125447227633 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698421636194 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720918158048 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969276983566 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657174218516 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.