The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon, from egg to adult fish.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram demonstrates, the detailed information of salmon life cycle in river, estuary and ocean site.
Overall, the development process starts from the river and migrate into ocean through estuary following the development period.
Initially, matured salmon spawn into the river and all the egg group together for a period of incubation. After the incubation period, egg emergence into the small fish appearance and move into the fresh water. Beginning stage of rearing program happening in the river itself. These small salmon calf trying to move on estuary to enter the ocean jointly. Later the success of rearing process from estuary small salmons enter into the ocean deliberately.
Secondly, approximate developed salmon calf pass through the estuary and migrate into the big ocean. From that site, half development occurs and fish may transferred to other rearing areas. Finally, salmons growth and development complete and fish again trying to move on river for spawning. Moreover, matured fish stayed in ocean for a while and moved to river for further spawning and generate more offspring.
- The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children s activities The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second graph shows the activities in which the girls participate
- Recent research suggests that the majority of criminals who are sent to prison commit crimes after they are released Why is this the case What can be done to solve this problem 67
- The average prices per kilometre of clothing imported into the European Union from six different countries in 1993 and 2003 are shown in the bar chart below Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where 78
- The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobilephone market for manufactures in the years 2005 and 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant . 78
- the table below shows the population of three cities in 1990 the population forcast for 2000 and the actual 2000
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42774566474 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55548864915 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531791907514 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 16.646047852 43.030603864 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.3636363636 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7272727273 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130994078625 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061601966806 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511478066474 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102546580222 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647838301413 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 61.2550243902 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.