Essay topics: Line graph : Clothing Export in 1999 - 2003 in Japan, Colombia and Myanmar.
The figure elucidates the number of clothing exports in three different nations from 1999 to 2003. At first glance, it is evident that all countries faced a palpitation over the entire period.
To begin with Japan and Colombia, the number of clothing export in Japan experienced a palpitation in between 1999, which was at well less 600 millions, and 2001, which made up at 600 millions. Erratically, it fell significantly in the following 2 years where it ended at just less than 500 millions. Furthermore, 1999 to 2002 witnessed a tremendous upsurge in the amount of clothing export in Colombia in which it, approximately, increased dramatically at around 250 millions. Nevertheless, it dropped considerably in the next year to end at just over 600 millions.
In accordance with Myanmar, there was enormous progress in the total of clothing export in Myanmar from 1999, which constituted at well under 100 million, through to 2001, which accounted for well across 900 millions, however, it faced an oscillation over the following 2 years and finished at just across 400 millions in 2003.
- The map below shows the changes in an American town between 1948 and 2010. 84
- Intelligent machines such as robots are widely applied to take the place of human beings. Please, discuss the advantages and disadvantages. 11
- In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both these views and give your own 67
- Line graph : Recycling rate for selected materials :1982 - 2010 78
- Nowadays many people work part or full time from home Some people say that working from home has many benefits while others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, well, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12290502793 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97372575211 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564245810056 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.5780139153 43.030603864 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21094206263 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102632240691 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0915333276821 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15005102667 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00229541846633 0.0819641961636 3% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.