The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
The given chart illustrates the total amount of energy consumed in America over the period of 28 years from 1980 with projections to 2030.
Overall, it is clear that petrol and oil are the dominant fuel while nuclear and other environmental power remain almost unchanged.
In 1980, petrol and oil were the fuels with the most quantity consumed. From 1980 to 1995, American witnessed an erratic fluctuation in the consumption of petrol and oil, reaching the number of nearly 30 quadrillion in 1985. Afterwards, there was an upward trend in the consumption of petrol oil and were forecasted to reach a peak of nearly 50 quadrillion units in 2030.
The consumption of coal is estimated to increase gradually, rising about 13 quadrillion from 1980 to 2030.
The quantity of natural gas consumed was around 20 quadrillion in 1980.Over the period of 35 years, the consumption of natural gas fluctuated dramatically and reached a high of about 25 quadrillion in 2015. Following this, the consumption of natural gas is expected to stay relatively unchanged until 2030.
The consumption of nuclear and other environmentally friendly energy is the lowest in 1980 with only 4 quadrillion units. From 1980, there were a lot of fluctuations in the consumption of them but almost unchanged till 2030.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-21 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-17 | neverlandforestcat | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-10 | brew | 78 | view |
- Online shopping is replacing the traditional way of shopping Is it a positive or negative trend 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 84
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 67
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 61
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ars from 1980 with projections to 2030. Overall, it is clear that petrol and oil...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 72, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Over
...sumed was around 20 quadrillion in 1980.Over the period of 35 years, the consumption...
^^^^
Line 9, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n of natural gas fluctuated dramatically and reached a high of about 25 quadrilli...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15094339623 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99175620624 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514150943396 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4176509667 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.2 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263079498187 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121798895488 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667737000255 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149948439381 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823678341392 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.