The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The line graph gives the information about the changes in the carbon dioxide emissions from 1967 to 2007. As an overview, the highest amount of changes observed in the emissions of carbon dioxide in Sweden.
It us evident that, the production of carbon dioxide showed the increased in the Italy and Portugal. Whereas, in 1967 in Portugal the emissions of carbon dioxide recorded with 1.3 metric tonnes which was further showed an increase and noticed as t.4 in the last year. However 4 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions noticed in Italy and in 2007 it recorded as 5.8 metric tonnes.
In addition to this, the emissions of carbon dioxide in United kingdom start with 10.3 and in the next years it showed a certain decrease and observed as 9.6 metric tonnes. Furthermore, in sweden there was a 8.2 metric tonnes carbon dioxide emissions and in the next 11 years this production observed with increasement as 10.2 metric tonnes. While, it showed a certain decrease and end up with 5.9 in the 2007.
To sum up, there were certain changes observed in the emissions of carbon dioxide in all the four nations.
- Nowdays, more people are choosing to socialise online rather than face to face . Is this is a positive or negative development? 61
- Calorie sources for UK males at different age group 81
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetabkes per day in the IKfrom 2001 and 2008. 78
- The development of tourism contributed to English becoming the most prominent language in the world. Some people think this will lead to English becoming the only language to spoken globally. What are the advantage and disadvantaged to having one languag 73
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language in order to work and travelling in foreign country. Others say that the only reasons why some one should learn a foreign language. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e line graph gives the information about the changes in the carbon dioxide emissi...
^^
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...se and noticed as t.4 in the last year. However 4 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide emis...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...noticed as t.4 in the last year. However 4 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide emissi...
^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arbon dioxide emissions noticed in Italy and in 2007 it recorded as 5.8 metric t...
^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... emissions noticed in Italy and in 2007 it recorded as 5.8 metric tonnes. In ...
^^
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...onnes. Furthermore, in sweden there was a 8.2 metric tonnes carbon dioxide emissi...
^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e next 11 years this production observed with increasement as 10.2 metric tonnes....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, whereas, while, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4684642943 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.432291666667 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0586809665 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.111111111 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351097309216 0.215688989381 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175526596365 0.103423049105 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516259704682 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222507740711 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696377814853 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.