The graph below shows changes in young adult unemployment rates in England between 1993 and 2012.
The line chart compares the joblessness proportions in London and the rest of England in the young adult from 1993 to 2012.
Overall, the percentages of unemployed people aged 16-24 were dramatically higher than the number of adults without work. Besides, London had consistently higher unemployment rates than the rest of England.
In the group aged 16-24, there was a gradual decline in unemployment proportions, inside and outside London, from 22% and 18% (1993) to 15% and just above 10% (2002), respectively. In the next 10 years, this figure in the capital rose significantly to reach a peak of 25% (2012). Besides, this number outside London also had a similar morphed but was lower nearly 5% than the group inside capital (2012).
Looking into overall London, there was a sharp drop in proportion without work from just below 15% (1993) to around 8% (2000), and stayed the same number to 2008, before rising again at nearly 10% (2012). Over 20 years, the figure unemployment of the rest of England slightly reduced from 10% (1993) to 8% (2012).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-28 | Tri H. Ho | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-14 | To Rang | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-03 | Phung Quang Tuan | 67 | view |
| 2018-07-26 | Khanh Ha | 84 | view |
| 2018-07-19 | manpreet kaurs | 78 | view |
- These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothersgo out to work. What could be the reasons for this? Do you think it is a positive or anegative development? 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because oftechnology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that peoplemake? Has this been a positive or negative development? 78
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealandand Germany in 1980 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding. 67
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011. The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one-person households. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tal 2012. Looking into overall London, there was a sharp drop in proportion wit...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86440677966 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58299004926 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54802259887 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0656090602 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.625 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236058873643 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115679074478 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726693320036 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163926542852 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626317957646 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.