The graph below shows changes in young adult unemployment rates in England between 1993 and 2012.
The line graph illustrates how the proportion of unemployment of people aged between 16 and 24 years in England changed in the period of 20 years from 1993 to 2012.
Overall, while the percentage of young adults who were jobless in England showed a fluctuating leapfrog, the overall rate of adults without job indicated a slight dip.
In 1993, level of joblessness in 16 to 24-year-old English living in London took the lead, with roughly 22%, which was 5% higher than that of those living in the rest of England. Both figures then experienced a significant decrease and reached their rock bottom at 15% and 11% in 2002 and 2004 respectively. However, they gathered pace and made a recovery to increase steadily in the remainder of the surveyed period. (It is noted that the proportion of young adults living in the capital was merely higher than that of dwellers living outside London).
In the year of 1993, the overall adult unemployment rate in London accounted for 14%, which was slightly higher than its counterpart-the rate in the rest of England, a difference of 4%. A striking similarity is that these figures then had a significant decrease in the 10 consecutive years and were below 10% at the end of the survey.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-20 | manhnguyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | Johndavisvu | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-24 | lattethuc | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-14 | Nguyễn Linh Hương | view | |
| 2022-08-20 | levanhoan123 | 67 | view |
- Spoken communication is more always powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks between 1979 and 2009 84
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 82
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities Do you agree or disagree 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77358490566 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76794767903 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556603773585 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.1470586837 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.571428571 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2857142857 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167854691143 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694052682859 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627761869167 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113767872704 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402750870743 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77358490566 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76794767903 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556603773585 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.1470586837 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.571428571 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2857142857 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167854691143 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694052682859 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627761869167 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113767872704 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402750870743 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.