The graph below shows a conference hall built in 1981 and planned for 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows a conference hall built in 1981 and planned for 2020.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make
comparisons where relevant.

The provided two diagrams compare the interior layout of a conference hall in 1981 and proposed plan for 2020.
Overall it can be observed that some parts of the layout remain same in new plan whereas most of the sections have been replaced or changed. Therefore, interior plan in 2020 has been substantially modified by integrating new sections and replacing the old ones.
Examining the diagrams in more detail, it is evident that the position of room, hall, and reception remain the same in new plan for 2020 in comparing with the layout of 1985. Gardens which was located at eastern side in 1985 is replaced by car parking in new plan. While gardens in the middle position have not been changed, this vast area is turned into six small blocks in modified layout for 2020 where one IT course, one canteen and kitchen, theree meeting rooms, and single game room are created in the southwestern part of new plan.
Looking at the north side of both plans, it is clear that the position of room and hall remained constant. Car park of old plan in 1985 has been replaced by large new blocks containing 20 rooms which are located on the northeast side of new plan for 2020.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-09-06 bassmodulators123 67 view
2024-08-31 bassmodulators123 78 view
2024-07-17 Zahid6400 73 view
2024-07-14 dorae 73 view
2024-07-04 nobitaa 73 view
Essays by user Zahid6400 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 112, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[7]
Message: The proper name in singular (Car) must be used with a third-person verb: 'parks'.
Suggestion: parks
...of room and hall remained constant. Car park of old plan in 1985 has been replaced b...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, therefore, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61722488038 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34021677337 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531100478469 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5045869629 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.625 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157291800864 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860208553772 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631563151872 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12565170038 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653520356446 0.0819641961636 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.