The graph below shows the consumption of different types of fast food in Australia among teenagers between 1975 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words
The diagram below demonstrates the intake of several kinds of junk food in Australia among young people from 1975 to 2000.
Overall, it can be seen that consumption of pizza and hamburgers showed significant rise over the period given, whereas the number of eaten fish and chips fell. At the beginning of the period fish and chips were the most popular products, but it was replaced by hamburgers, that became the most prevalent food among teenagers in the final years, and even pizza was in bigger demand than fish and chips starting from 1990.
According to the illustration, at the start fish and chips were eaten 100 times per year and neglect a small grown between 1980 and 1985 the figure dramatically dropped to about 40 times by 2000. Thus, the highest point was reached in 1975.
In sharp contrast to this, the intake rates of two other types of fast food surged. Both of them tremendously climbed to approximately 90 times eaten hamburgers in 1985 and pizza 10 years later. Afterwards, pizza’s consumption stayed stable and hamburgers’ consumption soared steady to 100 in 1995 before going to a plateau.
- Crime rates will fall as advances in technology make it easier to detect and prevent crimes Do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn about current events However others believe that they can learn news better through other media Discuss both views and give your opinion 76
- Some feel governments rather than private companies should be in charge of medical services To what extent do you agree or disagree 68
- People nowadays sleep less than they did in the past Why is this Do you think it is a negative or positive development 56
- Modern technology is now very common in most workplaces Do you think the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93157894737 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61947215084 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610526315789 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7911966362 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.125 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15337868545 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653568355829 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470122588439 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0974375540263 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428469923518 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.