This bar-graph illustrates how much meat people in a European country have consumed over a period of 25 years, between 1979 and 2004.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there were considerable downward trends in the consumption of both beef and lamb, whereas the intake of chicken saw a significant increase over the period in question. The consumption of fish on the other hand, has stayed fairly steady.
Looking at details, as regards the chicken consumption, it started at just below 150 grams per week per person (gr/w/p) in 1979 and grow gradually to almost 200 gr/w/p in 1989, at which point chicken became the most popular meat of all. Then it continued to rise until 2004, which was more than all of the others combined. As for the consumption of beef, the intake of beef was more than 200 gr/w/p in 1979. After some fluctuations, the amount of beef consumed, started to drop and continued this trend until 2004 when it hit a little above 100 gr/w/p. The consumption of lamb followed the same trend, starting at 150 gr/p/w in 1979 and ending at around 60 gr/p/w in 2003. With some marginal fluctuations, the intake of fish, however, stayed steady at 50 gr/p/w in the mentioned period.
- Favourite school subject for boys in school 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 73
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this. 61
- the table below compares the average number of vehicles using 3 roads. 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...have consumed over a period of 25 years, between 1979 and 2004. Overall, what ...
^^
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...to rise until 2004, which was more than all of the others combined. As for the consumption...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, then, whereas, as for, as regards, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74407582938 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50854651986 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611374407583 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3373095568 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.222222222 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226693612379 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940084519731 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673140129164 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169993154276 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760054543474 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.