The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005.
Summarise the information by choosing and describe the main idea, and make comparisons where appropriate.
The bar graph compares the trend of employment among men and women in six various countries. The study covers the period of 1995 and 2005.
Generally, the hiring rate continually increased in both men and women across the six nations within ten years. It is also clear that more men were employed than women in the same time frame.
In detail, at the end of 2005, there was a steady rise in the employment of men where the highest was noted in the UK from 55 % to 72 %. This was 17 % more than that which was initially recorded in 1995. Austrailia, Switzerland and Iceland closely followed with about 12 % of increase while the lowest was seen in New Zealand and the USA with a growth rate of about 10 % each.
A similar trend was observed among women who were hired within ten years with New Zealand and the America which grew by 13 % while Australia and Switzerland made an increment of about 11 %. Meanwhile, the female employment in the UK and Iceland only rose up to 10 % making them the lowest among all countries. By comparison, this figure was the same as that among their male counterparts in New Zealand and the US.
- Today, good health is essential among people. As the need for good health increases, medical service providers make use of their products to gain profit. Do you believe that medical services should not be run by profit making companies? Do you think that 73
- Do you support that the nuclear technology should be used for constructive purposes?Use your own knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence. 73
- The diagram below shows the number of landline telephones per 1000 people in different countries over a five year period Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Write at least 150 words 81
- Using cellphones and computers made communication among people much easier. As a result, letter-writing could be lost in the future. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement? What is your opinion? 78
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... with a growth rate of about 10 % each. A similar trend was observed among women...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 416, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...counterparts in New Zealand and the US.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56157635468 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40663115119 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566502463054 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7879655978 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107220097079 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500068483091 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305693169737 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0736712618107 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290209679528 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.