The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
In 2010, there were 750,000 visitors residing on the island. This figure rose to 1.5 million in 2013 and levelled off in the following 2 years. A decrease to 1.25 million in 2016 tourists saw it being surpassed by that of cruise ships before resurging to 1,5 million. Meanwhile, the number of tourists opting for staying on cruise ships oscillated between 0.25 million and 0.5 million in the first three years, before increasing significantly to overtake the number of tourists on island and hit its peak of 2 million in 2017.
The progressive pattern of both categories is reflected in the total number of tourists visiting the island. After skyrocketing from 1 million in 2010 to 2.75 million in 2015, it stabilised in 2016. Subsequently, this figure surged to reach its all-time high of 3.5 million in 2017.
The line graph displays the number of visitors of a Caribbean island from 2010 to 2017.
Overall, the total number of visitors to the island increased throughout the period with tourists on cruise ships and on island both witnessed an upward trend.
In 2010, there were 750,000 visitors residing on the island. This figure rose to 1.5 million in 2013 and levelled off in the following 2 years. A decrease to 1.25 million in 2016 tourists saw it being surpassed by that of cruise ships before resurging to 1,5 million. Meanwhile, the number of tourists opting for staying on cruise ships oscillated between 0.25 million and 0.5 million in the first three years, before increasing significantly to overtake the number of tourists on island and hit its peak of 2 million in 2017.
The progressive pattern of both categories is reflected in the total number of tourists visiting the island. After skyrocketing from 1 million in 2010 to 2.75 million in 2015, it stabilised in 2016. Subsequently, this figure surged to reach its all-time high of 3.5 million in 2017.
- The chart below shows the results of a British survey taken in 2005 related to the housing preferences of people in the UK 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below shows the percentage participation of women in senior management in three companies between 1975 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91111111111 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64922537013 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538888888889 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8372161159 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2222222222 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.77777777778 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238019684164 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127293660643 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118577838786 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178566306948 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812769833386 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.