The graph below shows that the percentage of Australian export to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012
The line graph illustrates the changes in Australian export percentages in 4 different areas over 22 years.
The percentage in China, on the whole, saw an increase of approximately 30%. Only Japan experienced a gradual decrease, while the US and India were unstable.
In 1990, both India nor China didn't import any Australian goods, contrary to 2 other countries such as Japan and the US. Japan topped the graph with approximately 26%, whilst the US had 11% of Australian export.
Throughout 22 years, China saw a massive increase from 0% to almost 30% in 2012, while the percentage in Japan slightly decreased. Besides, the US and India saw unstable fluctuations from 1990 to 2012. The data of Australian export in the US dropped after five years before showing a sign of an increase in 2000. However, it fell gradually until there was a slight rise in 2012. In India, the percentage of Australian exports remained at the bottom for three consecutive years until rising in 2010 but declined slowly in 2012.
- As machines have become more sophisticated more and more jobs and tasks involving physical hard work can be done automatically Do the positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects 73
- Modern technology has greatly influenced people s ways of entertainment making people less creative Do you agree or disagree 61
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household While the second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use
- Modern technology has greatly influenced people s ways of entertainment making people less creative Do you agree or disagree 67
- The diagrams show changes to a medical centre from 2008 to 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...stable. In 1990, both India nor China didnt import any Australian goods, contrary t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, while, such as, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91228070175 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76826317563 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619883040936 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.1849193239 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357913543076 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130043466682 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661266535168 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192660779698 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962471323204 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.