The graph below shows the post-school qualification held by Australian in the age groups 25 to 34 and 55 to 69.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting main futures, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pia chart shows Australia Post-school qualifications between the ages group 25 to 34 and 55 to 69. This data calculated in percentage.
In the first place, mostly degree held between 24 to 34 age people and their 1/3 figures degrees held 55 to 59 age group. Young age students 19.48% enroll in social science, arts as well as 20.42% figure shows in 55 to 69 age. Both are the highest level in the presentation and the Architecture field in 1.09% of students enroll in younger age and veterinary, agriculture in 2.0% of students have degree. Thir both ranks is the lowest level in the chart. Younger age in under 10% of students get degrees in engineering, agriculture, medical, law, other fields. Between 11 to 20 % include administration, education, and science, math, information technology field. Older age group under 4% of people have Architecture and law and other filed degree and other filed like medical and science, math information technology, engineering, education, administration in 10 to 20% student pass post-school.
Overall, all-time the best field is social science and art and the lowest student takes a degree in veterinary, agriculture field.
- The natural resources such as oil and freshwater are being consumed at alarming rate What problems it can cause How can we solve this problem 89
- The table below provides statistics on several major metro systems around the comparisons where relevant
- People should follow the customs and traditions when people start to live in a new country To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- As global trade increases between different countries many daily necessities are produced in other countries Such goods are usually transported a long distance Do the benefits of this trend outweigh its drawbacks 61
- How important is it for individuals and countries to think about the future rather than to focus on the present 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in 10 to 20% student pass post-school. Overall, all-time the best field is soci...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, well, as well as, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14659685864 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0463674791 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565445026178 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.9482159112 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207388445097 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886274722304 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115125285194 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160480935942 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130973362902 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.