The graph below shows the proportion of for different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.
The given line graph illustrates the trends of 4 different materials recycled in a country between 1982 and 2010.
Overall, it is clear that most of the figure experienced a climb. However, it also could not be denied that there was one figure suffering during the period.
During the first four-years, there were only two figures recycled, such as paper-cardboard and glass containers. Both of them had a contrast trend, consequently, their discrepancy became larger, from 15 per cent to 25 per cent. The amount of aluminium cans that firstly recycled in 1986 was increasing. Conversely, the paper-cardboard and glass containers were declining about both 5 per cent.
Moreover in 1990, paper-cardboard which had the greatest recycling rate was the only one which decreased gradually. Furthermore, glass containers and aluminium cans were both lifted up, however, the increase of aluminium was faster than the glass containers. Last but not least, the additional figure, the plastics, only elevated slightly, thus making it was the smallest recycling rate at the end of the period.
To conclude, there were numerous differences in the trends for 4 materials during the period.
- The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children s activities The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second graph shows the activities in which the girls participate 67
- The graph below shows the proportion of for different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990s 73
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 69
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ere declining about both 5 per cent. Moreover in 1990, paper-cardboard which had the ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35828877005 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01608070671 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.3852954117 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.0909090909 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.63636363636 5.23603664747 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188346841787 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077508865082 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109440871302 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142800767151 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136633072953 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ere declining about both 5 per cent. Moreover in 1990, paper-cardboard which had the ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35828877005 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01608070671 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.3852954117 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.0909090909 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.63636363636 5.23603664747 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188346841787 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077508865082 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109440871302 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142800767151 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136633072953 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.