The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
Given is the chart illustrating the comparison of people aged 65 or more in three countries from 1940 to 2040.
It is clear that the trend of this item is likely to increase in each country in the examined period. Remarkably, Japan is subject to overall volatility in its elderly proportion.
In 1940, standing at 9% of Americans was aged 65 and over which were higher than 7% of Swedish people and 5% of Japanese. Both figures for the USA and Sweden jumped further to 1980, at 15% and 14% respectively, while, the proportion of Japanese elderly people still was not over 5% until the 2000s.
However, the percentage of elderly people in Japan is about to rise into the foreseeable future. To be specific, the proportion of this category in Japan will increase by 5% to 10% during 20 years and it will receive appreciable acceleration to over 25% in the final year, while the figure for Sweden and USA will be slightly lower, at about 25% and 23% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | Thang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | uzubermy1@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | uzubermy1@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Sakil | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | ahmadrava88 | 67 | view |
- The table shows the average annual percentages of water pollution in four large cities in 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
- The pie chart below shows the results of a survey in which undergraduates and postgraduates were asked about the range of books and non print material in their school library Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 71
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufactures in the years 2005 and 2006. 60
- It is better to eat food which is produced locally by small farmers rather than food produced by factory farming and transported long distances To what extent do you agree or disagree 66
- The line chart bellow shows serious violent crime levels from 1978 to 2000 in the US. Serious violent crimes include rape, robbery, aggravated assault and homicide. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 799.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67251461988 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68519774428 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590643274854 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.8325586251 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.142857143 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152484909715 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706522860244 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840899739583 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101460832716 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0900123775598 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.