The graph gives information about male and female gym membership between 1980 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The information plotted in the given line graph analyses the male and female gym memberships throughout thirty years. The vertical axis shows data regarding the number of customers. Meanwhile, the horizontal one represents from five to five years the period between 1980 and 2010.
Overall, gym memberships faced fluctuations amongst both genders. This can be seen especially among men, as their number witnessed rapid changes over the years. In 2005, they reached a peak of 5000 people. Nevertheless, after this year, their number dropped suddenly, hitting the lowest of under 1000.
Additionally, the graph shows the trend of female gym memberships. In 1980, they were in the minority, being 1000 fewer than males. However, by 1995 ladies figure doubled and prevailed for approximately five years. A surpassing in numbers is also observable just before 2010 with a gap of over 1000 persons.
To sum up, between 1980 and 2010, both men and women had time-frames when their number of gym memberships dominated.
- An effective health care system should encourage people to take preventive measures against illness and disease rather than encourage them to rely on treatment To what extent do you agree with this statement 86
- The graph shows the number of visitors to four international museums between 1980 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The chart below shows the proportions of graduates from Brighton University in 2019 entering different employment sectors Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 69
- School teachers are more responsible for social and intellectual development of students than parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- More and more parents are allowing their children to play on computers and tablets as they think that children should learn technology skills Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, nevertheless, regarding, so, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2962962963 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75546594836 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.685185185185 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.8174242293 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.5 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.5 22.9334400587 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193084015027 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656366300445 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786097062282 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123811347076 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712218347589 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 61.2550243902 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.