The graphs above give information about fast food consumption in England
The line chart compares the figure for three kinds of fast foods eaten in England from 1970 to 1990.
Overall, the figures for F&C and P increased whereas H consumption saw a slight reduction during the period shown.
In 1970, the number of grams of H was highest, at approximately 300 grams, while these numbers of F&C and P were lower, at around 100 grams and 20 grams respectively. There was gradual rise in the consumption of P from around 20 grams to about 180 grams between 1970 and in 1990, an increase of approximately 160 grams in 20 years.
In 1978, the consumption of H experienced a slight decline to about 250 grams whereas a gradual rise can be seen in the figure for F&C to around 140 grams. The year 1981 marks a point at which the figures for H and F&C were equal, at about 200 grams. In the following 9 years, the former rose steadily to about 220 grams while the latter saw a dramatic increase to approximately 530 grams.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-07-14 | Zahid6400 | 61 | view |
| 2024-07-14 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-11 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
- Some people think that older school children should learn a wide range of subjects to acquire more knowledge while other people believe they should learn a small number of subjects in details Discuss both views and give your opinions 61
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 78
- In recent years the structure of a family and the role of its members are gradually changing What kinds of changes can occur Do you think these changes are positive and negative 87
- In many big cities in the world the quality of life is decreasing What are the causes and solutions for this 40
- Many young people change their jobs and careers. What are the reasons for this? Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 776.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.45977011494 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58134920544 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511494252874 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1069386451 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.857142857 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118556284634 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639617573903 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447886421623 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0837508388542 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460779800315 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.96 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.