The line graph below shows the population size, birth and death rate of England and Wales from 1700 to 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the total population as well as the natality rate and the mortality rate in two countries, both of which belong to the UK, namely England and Wales. from 1700 to 2000. Overall, it can be clearly seen that the population in England and Wales witnessed an upward trend, whilst the birth and death rates followed a fluctuating trend. Additionally, the birth ratio was constantly higher than the figure for fatalities over the period given.
The data indicates that from 1700 to 1750, the birth rate and the death rate were similar, rising from 30 to 40 per 1,000 citizens for the birth rate and from 26 to 37 per 1,000 people for the death rate. Both of these proportions remained stable from 1750 to 1800. After 1800, a sharp decline could be seen in both two ratios; these proportions hit their lowest point in 1950, at approximately 22 per 1000 inhabitants for the natality rate and 20 per 1000 people for the figure of fatalities. The death rate remained stable from 1950 to 2000. However, the birth rate recovered to 32 per 1,000 people, the same as in 1900, and then reached its highest point at 35 per 1,000 people in 2000.
Furthermore, the population of England and Wales started with only 5 million in 1700 and grew to 10 million in 1750. From 1750 to 1800, the populations of both countries decreased by 4 million. Nonetheless, a skyrocketing trend in these countries' populations could be observed from 1800 onwards, constituting 45 million people in 1950 and finally achieving a peak of 50 million people.
- The line graph below shows the population size birth and death rate of England and Wales from 1700 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The bar chart shows active participation rates in top ten sports in Canada in 1998 and 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- the charts below show the information about land use in four countries 67
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football While other people think that taking part in individual sports is better like tennis or swimming Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufactures to produce vehicles at their US factories 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, however, nonetheless, then, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1289.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88257575758 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88625178738 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518939393939 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 352.8 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9088103248 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.181818182 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245125765889 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107388160086 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074663990622 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173304992794 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623841385964 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.