The maps show how the town of Harborne changed from 1936 to 2007.
The diagram delineates the transformation of Harborne from a nearly uninhabited place into a thriving town in the period from 1936 to 2007.
It can be clearly seen that the town was underdeveloped in 1936 with few structures. In the center, It can be divided into two parallel parts, one included a post office, a sweet shop, and some butchers; the other side had a flower shop, a bank, and a library. The North was occupied by natural features, three trees were in the North West and a river was in North East. In the South was Government offices, a piece of land for farming and a winding path for cycling.
By 2007, considerable alterations had occurred in the town as a flourishing city surrounding the River. Government Offices and the Farm Land had converted into a Museum and a Golf Course, respectively. Two trees in the North West had been knocked down, and the cycle path had rebuilt to a curved road.
In the central area, the sweet shop and place for butchers were emerged to form a supermarket while the flower shop was turned into a travel agent. The final feature deserves a mention is that a commercial center was built between two blocks.
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community. They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole.Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Today people are living longer, so they should work longer. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile cell phones in a European country from January to September 2002 measured in euro 89
- The maps show how the town of Harborne changed from 1936 to 2007. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6359223301 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69443714283 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558252427184 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.7814686437 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.4 5.23603664747 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121197982643 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561198288718 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101846799432 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105133902954 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13069123786 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.