One of the best methods to motivate and encourage workers is to pay them according to what they produce or sell. Do you think this is the best method? Give relevant examples from your experience.
Some people hold the opinion that compensates employees according to their work and strength is to be better way to motivate them. While I believe that it has many ways to motivate employees but, good compensation of work is one of the most essential part to encourages workers.
To begin with I would like to outline the advantages of compensation of workers which plays most important role to motivate workers. One of the obvious advantages of paying better compensation is that people give their extra effort to the work that ultimately is far beneficial for company's growth, along with this, workers spend more and more time with organization instead of moving to other organization. Moreover, it has seen many times in most of the organizations that workers does not spend much time in organization owing to less concentration of employer and unfair compensation of their work. Furthermore, labor plays most imperative role among the organization which can be called back bone of the industry as well that always will be worthwhile for the industry. There is no denying that attractive salary always motivate people either he or she is labor or senior manager for instance, most of the organizations pays a handsome amount to their employee at the end of year in the shape of benefits such as, bonus, extra leaves, occasion’s benefits and many others which motivate and convince them to do work with heart and soul.
In contrast, it has seen many times in most of the industries wherein workers only go for passing their time owing to less compensation and no annually benefits, even number of industries does not provide basis sustenance of labors which is being set by the government, alongside, some industries treats with their employees like a slave especially in third word countries where people are more worry rather than others. Many adepts emphasize that this is the responsibility of government to look after and check each and every thing of the industries with transparency, as well as implement sanctions at every one in case of bridging law.
To sum up, it is evident that in order to motivate and enthusiastic to employees should be satisfied by their compensation and benefits which is need of every person. Meanwhile, government needs to focus on those industries that are not following rules of the government.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-05-31 | Muhammad Waleed Khan | 72 | view |
- Online, people write product reviews and opinion about services. Is it good thing or bed thing? 78
- People can access games or films at any time on mobile devices such as smart phones, tablets and laptop computers. Do the advantages of such developments outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Some people believe that children are given too much free time. They feel that this time should be used to do more school work. How do you like children should be spend their free time? 84
- There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays? 63
- The Chart below shows the global sales of different kind digital games from 2000 to 2006. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, look, moreover, so, third, thus, well, while, for instance, in contrast, such as, as well as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 16.0 3.15609756098 507% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 5.60731707317 535% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 33.7804878049 192% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 3.97073170732 453% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 965.302439024 203% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 389.0 196.424390244 198% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04370179949 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 3.73543355544 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90243088603 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 106.607317073 184% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503856041131 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 613.8 283.868780488 216% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.8118450127 43.030603864 227% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 178.363636364 112.824112599 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.3636363636 22.9334400587 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3636363636 5.23603664747 236% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0903648166291 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413905060172 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310014048951 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0572532495419 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339998098862 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.2329268293 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.95 61.2550243902 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 10.3012195122 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 40.7170731707 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.