The percentage of school-aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010
The table indicates the proportion of school-aged boys in two various age groups that engaged in 5 items in the UK in 2010.
Overall, in both age groups from 6 to 11 and from 12 to 16, football was attended with the highest percentage. By contrast, swimming was at the lowest percentage in 5 sports.
With boys from 6 to 11 years old, football accounted for 87%, the largest proportion in 5 items. Meanwhile, basketball and cricket made up more 30% with 35% and 45%, respectively. However, the statistics for rugby and swimming were just 23% and 19% respectively, a minor percentage.
With boys from 12 to 16 years old, the proportion of playing football was the same highest as age of 6 to 11, 78%. Meanwhile, basketball and cricket were joined with the reasonable percentage, 25% and 34%, respectively. The proportion of rugby and swimming that boys 12-16 engaged in were similar to age of 6 to 11, just lower than 2% and the same as 19%, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-18 | duyenphung2011 | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | duyenphung2011 | 61 | view |
| 2017-12-20 | CongHuyen97 | 56 | view |
| 2018-07-23 | Amarjit | 22 | view |
- The percentage of school aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010 59
- People should become vegetarian because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet 56
- People today do not feel safe either at home or when they are out. What are the causes? What are the solution? 56
- The pie chart shows a comparision of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005 56
- hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 795.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70414201183 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91421169613 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497041420118 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.972339782 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.3333333333 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186218483863 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883172619326 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124283906894 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161209039661 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15392268867 0.0819641961636 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.