Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
People have different views with regard to the question about how to solve environmental problems. In my view, both way should be used together to reduce environmental problems.
On the one hand, the more simple life people live, the more environmental problems will be solved. The main advantage of simpler lives is that make the air fresher. For example, trees are less cut down for industry, so air pollution will be reduced. Moreover, lives without too much technology absolutely decrease heating environment. Another point in favor of simple lives is that bring cleaner and larger biodiversity for animal.
On the other hand, I believe that growing in technology can solve various environmental problems. There are quite many machines that help reduce sewage without affecting to the air. For instance, in Hanoi, you can see several exercise machines in the park that not only use for exercising but also filter sewage. In addition, government is installing WiFi running by rubbish. I think it is a wonderful idea because it can encourage more people to throw rubbish in the right place. Another benefit from developing technology is that it definitely clears deeper sewers than worker
In conclusion, both developing technology and living simpler lives are vitally good for solving environmental problems. Everyone should follow and try to protect environment together
- Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and giv 56
- The pie chart shows a comparision of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005 56
- The percentage of school aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010 59
- People should become vegetarian because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet 56
- Nowadays, more and more people decide to have children later in their life. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in my view, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1166.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 218.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34862385321 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80661980343 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637614678899 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3949002779 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.2857142857 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5714285714 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389779647099 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123267374514 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139238864602 0.0667982634062 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2549477221 0.151304729494 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0952728121425 0.056905535591 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.