The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land become less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990.

Essay topics:

The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land become less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990.

The first circular representation reveals the information about land degradation through distinct genesis, and the second tabular representations illustrate the percentum of three region land that got degraded due to several causes in 1990. It is a clear and coherent representation.
It is lucid, all over the planet there are number of causes for land degradation such as: Over-cultivation, Overgrazing, Deforestation and Other. Due to excess of overgrazing more than one third (35%) land got affected while 30% land was unproductive due to cutting of trees. However, 28% land degraded by over-cultivation, and a meagre of land demolish from other reasons.
Moving ahed, it is clear in North America just a 5% land was barren by over-cultivation, deforestation and overgrazing 3.3%,0.2% and 1.5% repectively. In Euorpe maximum land (23%) was downgrading through these reason: 9.8% deforestation ,7.7% over-cultivation and 5.5% overgrazing. At last in Oceania overall 13% land degraded, and the drastic cause for barren land which was overgrazing(11.3%), it was more than as compared to two other causes.
Overall, it is clearly seen that all over the land overgrazing was major reason of unproductive land wheras maximum land degraded in Europe as compare to the other nation.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-06-22 Navroop kaur 78 view
2018-06-22 kaur randhawa 78 view
2018-03-22 Baonguyenqn3011 78 view
2018-03-11 manhhg 56 view
2015-05-05 Saeed2 70 view
Essays by user kaur randhawa :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s the information about land degradation through distinct genesis, and the second...
^^
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...through these reason: 9.8% deforestation ,7.7% over-cultivation and 5.5% overgrazi...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, so, third, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44444444444 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.50038988019 2.65546596893 132% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585858585859 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0920254221 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.777777778 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13687200631 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638381883177 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343270820918 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960291083573 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.011967549522 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.