The pie chart illustrates the comparison between the amount of energy produced in 1995 and 2005.
Overall, it seems that coal, gas and petrol were the most widely used substance for the production of energy during both years. One other interesting thing to note is that, coal and gas seems to be on top in 2005 even after a decade of development in alternative and renewable energy sources.
Looking into the details, in 1995 coal and gas were the most used providing around 29%. Fuels like petrol which were primarily used in automotive were also providing the same amount of energy in 1995. Alternative energy forms like nuclear power were only able to produce around 7%. The rest of the 4% of energy were produced in other forms.
In 2005, coal and gas were able to produce around 30% of energy as opposed to petrol which was only produce around 19% of the total energy. The development in electric automotive may caused the downfall in petrol usage. On the other hand nuclear energy went up to a total of 10% and the rest of the 9% of energy was produced from other forms of energy.
- Some people think that shops should not be allowed to sell food or drinks that are scientifically proven to be bad for people s health Do you agree or disagree 56
- Despite the best efforts of crime fighting organizations crime will never be eradicated from civilized society To what extent do you agree 56
- Many people think that some individuals are naturally good leader Others think that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views 73
- Employers should focus on personal qualities over qualifications and experience when choosing someone for a job To what extent do you agree or disagree 38
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this massage 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, may, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50769230769 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32950376072 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451282051282 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 195.0 22.4926829268 867% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 879.0 112.824112599 779% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 195.0 22.9334400587 850% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 38.0 5.23603664747 726% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140877806518 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140877806518 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116508909629 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657318264275 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 97.3 13.2329268293 735% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -117.99 61.2550243902 -193% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 78.2 10.3012195122 759% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.06 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.49 8.06136585366 192% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 59.0 11.4329268293 516% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 80.0 10.9970731707 727% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 80.0 11.0658536585 723% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.