In this competitive world every major employer around the globe is hiring based on individuals qualifications and experience over personal qualities. Some may argue that employers and companies should choose personal qualities over skill and experience of the employee. I partially disagree with this statement, and in this essay i will explain a few reasons why i think so.
skill-full employers are backbone of every successful companies and organisation and experienced senior employer are irreplaceable. These factors contribute to the growth of company than anything, therefore employers of all sort hire by judging their and skill and experience more than personal quality as a person. This is not to say that organisations do not consider personality of an individual at all, they do on a low scale. For example, most establishments do not hire people with their face tattooed even though they are highly skilled and professional. The reason that qualifications and experience of employees contribute highly to the success of a company forces the organisation to hire based on skill and not personality.
On the other hand, some argue that personality of the employer should be the top priority when hiring is due the incidents of harassment and crime in work environment. These incidents are very rare and resolved easily. These crimes are spontaneous incidents and cannot be foreseen. In the process of interview while hiring, people who tends to be aggressive and violent are rejected to avoid further crime and ensure safety in workplace.
In conclusion, people should be hired based on their expertise and experience for the successful growth of the organisation and individual's personality should be considered but should not be top priority as it will not help the company's growth in terms of profit.
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 68
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this massage 56
- Some people think that shops should not be allowed to sell food or drinks that are scientifically proven to be bad for people s health Do you agree or disagree 56
- Many people think that some individuals are naturally good leader Others think that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views 73
- Some people think that shops should not be allowed to sell food or drinks that are scientifically proven to be bad for people s health Do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 328, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...e with this statement and in this essay i will explain a few reasons why i think ...
^
Line 1, column 361, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... essay i will explain a few reasons why i think so skillfull employers are bac...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23875432526 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00849879535 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498269896194 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 289.0 20.2975951904 1424% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1514.0 106.682146367 1419% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 289.0 20.7667163134 1392% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 90.0 7.06120827912 1275% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254127615967 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.254127615967 0.084324248473 301% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156969522111 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773232994005 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 147.8 13.0946893788 1129% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -230.32 50.2224549098 -459% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 117.2 11.3001002004 1037% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.59 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 21.52 8.58950901804 251% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 9.78957915832 582% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 117.6 10.1190380762 1162% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 118.0 10.7795591182 1095% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.