The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010.
The pie chart depicts that production of energy from different sources in two countries NZ and Germany between 1980 and 2010.
It is clear that, overall generation of electricity in Germany in 2010 was exactly double than in 1980. Whereas, NZ largely depends on coal while, the figure was almost triple in 2010 that was highest over the period.
In terms of New Zealand in 1980, Only 56 units energy was produced from coal. Furthermore, the number of energy generation was almost triple at 150 in 2010. Afterwards, after experiencing an increase to 46 units, hydro was used for generation of energy, accounted for about 30. Then, According to natural gas and petroleum, figure of electricity Creation stood at 30 and 11 respectively in 1980 since, it declined drastically to 2 units for both sources in 2010.
Regarding Germany, there was drastic decrease in use of natural gas from 28 in 1980 to 2 in 2010. But, people used the nuclear for the generating electricity represented at 20, before witnessing a rise to 155 throughout the period. For Hydro, it was least used for generating only 7 units electricity. During the same period from 1980 to 2010, there was same number of units of electricity which was produced from petroleum at 28.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Trang Carina | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | noor salah | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | Sơn Joyous | 67 | view |
- The table chart and pie chart give information about the total value and sources of fish imported to us between 1988 and 2000. 67
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980 and the 1990s. 78
- Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people say that it is too late to do something while others think that actions can be taken to improve the situation. Discuss both sides of the view and give your opinio 56
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 78
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
...e figure was almost triple in 2010 that was highest over the period. In terms of New Zea...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, regarding, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1038.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89622641509 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73218687879 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556603773585 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1137608736 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3636363636 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279234086913 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120955707098 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825091393189 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198250767826 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585630463128 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.