The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries.
Write a report for a university, lecturer describing the information shown below.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.
vThe pie charts illustrate the percentage of the five methods of hazardous waste management in the Republic of Korea, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.
Overall, what stands out from the pie charts is that while the prevalence of underground dumping can be seen in the United Kingdom and Sweden to dispose of harmful garbage, the Republic of Korea mostly relies on recycling for the same. Moreover, Sweden and the Republic of Korea are following three major techniques to manage unsafe waste, whereas all the waste management methods are used by the UK except recycling.
In regards to the United Kingdom, most of the perilous waste goods are disposed of by dumping them in a landfill, which accounted for 82%. Only just a small quantity of 2% of waste is incinerated whilst Chemical treatment and dumping at sea are used equally to get rid of hazardous waste material which amounted to 8% for each.
Moving to Sweden, although 5% more than half of the dangerous waste is buried underground, the rest total of 45% is being treated by burning and recycling the formal accounts for one-fifth and the latter manages the one-third of the total harmful waste produced by Sweden.
Turning to the Republic of Korea, while 69% of hazardous rubbish is being recycled, underground dumping helps to destroy 22%, and only 9% of dangerous waste is treated by fire.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-21 | appollo abu | 11 | view |
| 2022-09-08 | giangngoc | 70 | view |
| 2022-09-08 | giangngoc | 70 | view |
| 2022-08-09 | Nguyen Thuy Anh | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-23 | kaur g | 56 | view |
- Some experts say that the government do more to prepare for natural disasters Other believe that dealing with the aftermath of a natural disaster should be the priority discuss both views and give your own opinion give reasons for your answer and include 89
- In some parts of the world people try to find out one s own family history Why do people do this Do you think it is positive or negative 78
- Some people think that men and women have different qualities Therefore some certain jobs are suitable for men and some jobs are suitable for women To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- In some parts of the world people try to find out one s own family history Why do people do this Do you think it is positive or negative 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: VThe
vThe pie charts illustrate the percentage of...
^^^^
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ground dumping can be seen in the United Kingdom and Sweden to dispose of harmful...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: Regarding; With regard to
...are used by the UK except recycling. In regards to the United Kingdom, most of the perilou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aterial which amounted to 8% for each. Moving to Sweden, although 5% more than ...
^^^
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uried underground, the rest total of 45% is being treated by burning and recyclin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1133.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94759825328 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56834646755 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541484716157 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.1648119236 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.857142857 112.824112599 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.7142857143 22.9334400587 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.097773895387 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516510359577 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0105227607415 0.0843802449381 12% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0594982372627 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0102917068821 0.0819641961636 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.