The pie charts below show the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and 2007.
The given pie charts illustrate the information about the reasons that students chose before deciding to go to a UK university in the 2 years 1987 and 2007. Overall, the majority of students there considered a suitable degree course to be the main factor, and there was a tendency of students wanting to be close to their parents after 20 years.
According to the charts, 35% of the students studied at the university because of suitable degree courses in 1987, higher than the percentage of those who went to the university because of quality resources and sports/social activities by 14% and 16%, respectively. Much lower than these figures, quality of teaching and being close to parents only accounted for 15% and 10% of the reasons in 1987.
However, it can also be observed that two decades later, the proportion of students who wanted to be close to their parents increased to almost a quarter, whereas that of those who sought sports and social activities dropped to as low as 6%. Meanwhile, in comparison to the 8% of students choosing the quality of teaching of the university, twice as many chose the quality of resource in 2007.
- The tradition that a family gets together to eat meals is disappearing What are the reasons and what are the impacts 11
- Some people prefer shopping in shopping centers while others prefer local markets What are the advantages of each Which shopping experience do you prefer 95
- Online shopping is becoming more popular How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of work required 89
- Some people think the government should pay for healthcare and education but there is no agreement about whether it is the government’s responsibility? What is your opinion? 89
- It seems that with the increase in the use of mobile phones and computers, fewer people prefer to write letters. Will the skill of writing disappear completely? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun chose seems to be countable; consider using: 'many choses'.
Suggestion: many choses
...of teaching of the university, twice as many chose the quality of resource in 2007.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, whereas, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85204081633 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72929618845 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545918367347 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.7559113225 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.5 112.824112599 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.6666666667 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262616623494 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135556510255 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115815262363 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17941789569 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914484385577 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.