The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.
The comparison illustrated in the table showing the variation in percentage of students attending four different scools during 2000 and 2009.
From an overall analysis of the table, it clearly shows the downgrade in percentage of students attending the three schools; specialist, grammar and voluntary-controlled schools. On the other hand, a noticeable rise in the percentage of pupils attending the Community school in the same period of time, from 2000 till 2009.
In the exact starting year of the second millennium, the voluntary-controlled school aquired the highest percentage of attending pupils by more than fifty percent “52% to be scpecific”, but this percentage kept degrading to 38% in 2005 and ended at only 20% at 2009. The Grammar school didn’t pass the 25% of students over the three years shown in the table, as well as, the specialists school; However, the grammar school got the higher percentage of pupils between the two schools.
With a remarkable increase in attendance, the community school had only 12% of attending pupils in the year of 2000. This percentage has risen to 32 in 2005, but reached its peak in 2009 by fifty eight percent to be the highest percentage of attendance between the four schools over the three years shown in the table.
- The diagram shows the process of making leather products 61
- The pie charts below show the percentage of kinds of books sold by a bookseller between 1972and 2012 67
- Some people think that it would be better for large companies and industry to move to regional areas outside large urban centers Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 88
- Many criminals commit further crimes as soon as they are released from prison What do you think are the causes of this What effects will this have on society 89
- The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from1982 to 2010 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...different scools during 2000 and 2009. From an overall analysis of the ...
^^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ending the Community school in the same period of time, from 2000 till 2009. In t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e period of time, from 2000 till 2009. In the exact starting year of t...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...age of pupils between the two schools. With a remarkable increase in...
^^^
Line 7, column 202, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: fifty-eight
...n 2005, but reached its peak in 2009 by fifty eight percent to be the highest percentage of...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er the three years shown in the table.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1081.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14761904762 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03936754968 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509523809524 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.1249967544 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.428571429 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302889536687 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157041095041 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605225826216 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203364783577 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510959824038 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.