The table provide information about the percentage of children who faced seven different educational problems in school A and school B over the period of ten years from 2005.
Overview, the proportion of pupils had faced a considerable number of issues in School A than that of school B both given years. Between 2005 and 2015, the percentage of children reported reading ability in School A almost similar, while school B was recorded 8% and 9% respectively. In terms of handwriting, both schools were registered at 28% and 7% within given periods.
When 30% of students had faced spelling problem from school A, the figure for school B was just 7% in 2005. By 2015, the data for school B was 15% less than that of school A. In case of listening skills and verbal expression of ideas, noticed exactly at 35% in school A, whereas school B had shown 11% and 14% respectively.
However, there was a one percent of difference had shown in school A and three percent difference in school B in 2015. The percentage of children had faced concentration in lessons declined significantly from 40% in 2005 in school A to 18% in 2015, but there was no change in both schools. Finally, following instructions showed a considerable decline from a massive 42% to moderate 18%. In contrast, the figures for school B in 2015 was twice as much as that of school A in 2005.
- The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008 94
- In some countries, the average weight of people is increasing and their level of health and fitness is decreasing.What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 84
- As populations grow and cities become more crowded there is pressure through out the world to construct ever taller building to provide accommodation and offices Many people object to such developments citing the social as well as the physical dangers do 68
- Benefits of using solar energy for residential purposes is necessary these days. Discuss 84
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for examples working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cational problems in school A and school B over the period of ten years from 2005...
^^
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iod of ten years from 2005. Overview, the proportion of pupils had faced a con...
^^
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ldren reported reading ability in School A almost similar, while school B was re...
^^
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing ability in School A almost similar, while school B was recorded 8% and 9% re...
^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...% respectively. In terms of handwriting, both schools were registered at 28% and...
^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... In terms of handwriting, both schools were registered at 28% and 7% within giv...
^^
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...red at 28% and 7% within given periods. When 30% of students had faced spelling ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lem from school A, the figure for school B was just 7% in 2005. By 2015, the data...
^^
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ideas, noticed exactly at 35% in school A, whereas school B had shown 11% and 14...
^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l B had shown 11% and 14% respectively. However, there was a one percent of dif...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 11% and 14% respectively. However, there was a one percent of difference ha...
^^
Line 7, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...significantly from 40% in 2005 in school A to 18% in 2015, but there was no chang...
^^
Line 7, column 302, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was no change in both schools. Finally, following instructions showed a consider...
^^
Line 7, column 405, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...assive 42% to moderate 18%. In contrast, the figures for school B in 2015 was twi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1126.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69166666667 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81749248249 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504166666667 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1755313367 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.363636364 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 1.69756097561 825% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334806311161 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1507225532 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964943451342 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245993246766 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729426173922 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.