The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.
The table illustrates the data on the underground railway networks in terms of the and the year the railway system was initiated, routes covered, and the number of passengers traveling annually in six major cities in the world.
Overall, the networks in Lon Don, Paris, and Tokyo are older, have longer routes and serve a larger quantity of passengers every year, compared with those in Washington DC, Kyoto, Los Angeles.
Established in 1863, London underground network is the oldest and has the longest length of route among six cities, with 394 km, roughly twice as much as the second-longest system in Paris and serves 775 million passengers per year. The underground systems in Paris and Tokyo were opened in the first few decades of the 20th century and have 199 km and 155 km of route respectively, which are far less than the network in London. However, these two systems have far more customers than that in London, with Tokyo underground being the busiest with 1927 million passengers on a yearly basis.
The three less busy underground systems are those in Washington DC, Tokyo, and Los Angeles, with the passengers per year figure of 144,45 and 50 million respectively, which are just fractions of the figures for London, Paris, and Tokyo. The newest system is in Los Angeles, which only began to operate at the turn of the new millennium, and has 28km of route. Both Washington DC and Kyoto networks were opened in the final decades of the 20th century. However, the underground in Washington DC have 126km of route while the figure for Kyoto system is the only 11km that was the lowest in all given cities
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | snowsss | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | snowsss | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | Adeola Nafisat | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | habeeb omran | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | AFSAL | 11 | view |
- The international community must act immediately to ensure that all nations reduce their consumption of fossil fuels a.g gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as South Pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 65
- Some people think that personal happiness is directly related to economic success. Other argue that happiness depends on other factors. Discuss both sides and give your opinion? 73
- cities owadays people use bicycle less as a form of transport. Why is that? What can we do to encourage people to use bicycle more? 61
- Children’s education is expensive. In some countries, the governments pay some or all of the costs. Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 605, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that was the lowest in all given cities
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 965.302439024 140% => OK
No of words: 279.0 196.424390244 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8458781362 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54377787425 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491039426523 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 396.9 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.1917466424 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.222222222 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167407849888 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783649688773 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712135697712 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1155245974 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0896386489108 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.