The table below shows the consumer durable (telephone, refrigerator, etc )owned in Britain from 1972 to 1983.
The given table chart represents data regarding durables items owned by British people from 1972 to 1983.
Looking at all overall perspective, it is readily apparent that television was the most popular product owned by people. While the less owned household appliances were video and dishwasher that had been introduced to the British families later in 1983 and 1978 respectively.
Having a glimpse at the illustration reveals that 93 percents of televisions were owned by British people and continued to rise and received 98 percents in 1983. Central heating and telephone started from less than 45 percents and reached 76 percents and 60 percents respectively. The majority of British citizens had vacuum cleaner and refrigerator more than 90percents that rose from 87 percents to 95 percents and 73 percents to 93 percents respectively.
Shifting to remaining data, the percentage of washing machine increased by 14 percents from 1972 to 1983. Only 5 percents dishwasher was bought by people. In addition to it, the British masses showed not much interest in purchasing the video.
- Far too little has been done to prevent animals and plants from dying out although people have been aware of this problem for a long time Why do people do so little about it give suggestions on how to solve this problem 56
- The table shows the reason for studying the English language for the people of Japan The information is based on a survey that was conducted in the year 2000 63
- It seems that with the increase in use of mobile phones and computers fewer people prefer to write letter will the skill of writing disappear completely 56
- A lot of people spend a major part of their adult life at work so job satisfaction is very important for individual happiness What are the main factors that contribute to job satisfaction What are the possible solutions for people who are unsatisfied w 56
- The chart bellow shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, regarding, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21965317919 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81416824626 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566473988439 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 173.0 22.4926829268 769% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 903.0 112.824112599 800% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 173.0 22.9334400587 754% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 39.0 5.23603664747 745% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188332730117 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188332730117 0.103423049105 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142220190243 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860032243438 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 89.7 13.2329268293 678% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -95.66 61.2550243902 -156% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 69.6 10.3012195122 676% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.18 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 16.87 8.06136585366 209% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 11.4329268293 490% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 71.2 10.9970731707 647% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 90.0 11.0658536585 813% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.