The table below shows the number of medals won by the top ten countries in the London 2012 Olympic Games.
The given table depicts the record for top ten countries who earned the number of medals (Gold, Silver and Bronze) in the London Olympic Games in 2012.
Overall, the United states secured first rank by winning highest medals in all the category while the Australia was at the 10th position in that Olympic Games.
Regarding the table, the USA was on the top most position with 46 Gold, 29 Silver and 29 Bronze medals in that Olympic Games whereas the Australian got only 7 Golds and remained at 10th number, but they earned more Silver and Bronze in comparison with Italy, Hungary, France and South Korea. Similarly, the Chinese won 38 Gold, 25 Silver and 22 Bronze medals and acquired 2nd rank in table.
The 3rd, 4th and 5th position was obtained by the Russia, South Korea and Germany with 29, 24 and 13 Golds respectively. However, The Germany and France received 11 Golds each but the German bagged 19 Silver in contrast to only 11 by France which resulted in 6th rank for the Germany. The same thing happened in the case of Italy and Hungary, they both got 8 golds but the Hungarian was able to achieved only 4 silvers compared to 9 by Italian Athletes, due to that they were at 8th position.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | happyhappy | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | livevanzz | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | Kamal1993 | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-28 | Shaibal das | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | hunanmail | 67 | view |
- The table below shows the number of medals won by the top ten countries in the London 2012 Olympic Games. 78
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK. 78
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at Queen marry Hospital since its construction in 1960. 73
- Advances in technology and automation have reduced the need for manual labor. Therefore, working hours should be reduced. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- More and more business as well as individuals are choosing to communicate either professionally of socially rather than being face to face. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using technology for communicating. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, regarding, similarly, so, whereas, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 990.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58333333333 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23175040642 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.9233331005 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.428571429 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8571428571 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8571428571 5.23603664747 246% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185087796671 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980072891509 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133902255423 0.0843802449381 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155985869327 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152161074799 0.0819641961636 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.88 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.