The table below shows the percentage of adults in urban and rural areas who took part in four free time activities in 1990 and 2010. Summarize the information and compare where relevant, by selecting and reporting the key features.
The table illustrates the proportion of adults in city and countryside who spent break time doing numerous activities in 1990 and 2010. Overall, the number of people in all activities in urban and rural areas followed the upward trend in both year. Reading accounted for the highest number of individuals while photography took contrarily.
According to the given table, the percentage of readers in 1990 in urban was fewer than those in rural. However, the number steadily the same after 20 years. The proportion of adults utilized time for animated play in the city was similar to its in 2010. Nevertheless, that statistic adjusted considerably in the rural area, which decreased from 18% to 14%.
Looking closer to the detail, playing accounted for 21 percent of citizens but this number fell down to 14% after 20 years while the percentage of rural dwellers was the same with 26% in both 1990 and 2010. The number of people took photography in urban area was lower than those in the rural for approximately 2 times, but the statistic rose dramatically 20 years later.
- The charts below show the percentage of Australian men and women in three age groups who were employed in 1984 2001 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people believe that school children should not be given homework by their teachers whereas others argue that homework plays an important role in the education of children Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion 84
- The diagrams show the structure of a solar panel and its use Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- Reporting of crimes and other kinds of violent news on television and in newspapers can have adverse consquences This kind of information should be restricted from being shown in the media To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, look, nevertheless, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95580110497 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67646344061 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53591160221 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.372539442 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218434883856 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937695319016 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593931563409 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164472797678 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461940068265 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.