The table below shows the projected costing over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects for sustainable forestry. The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first year as the projects are set up.
The table predicts the investment in order to ensure the sustainable of the forest environment in three different regions West Africa, Central America and South-east Asia from the year 2020 to 2024. Meanwhile, the pie chart illustrates how those money would be used in the beginning year.
Overall, there is no important connection between the charts. The spending for these projects are expected to drop over the period, except for South-east Asia region. In addition, it seemed that salaries take up a major part of the expenditure, while there are a sizeable proportion is allocated to training and office expenses.
Both West Africa and Central America are projected to follow a downward pattern in their costing. To be precise, there is 20 million are spent on Central America forest in the beginning and this figure is estimated to decrease and remain at 5 million for the last three years. Although, West Africa have the same trend, start from 10.5 million and slowly reduce to 2.5 million, but by the end of the period the number go up a little to 3.5 million. In contrast, the pattern is reserved for South-east Asia region. The investment in this area start at 30 million and it is predicted to end up at 50 million, even though there will be a minor cut back to 20 million in the year 2021.
Regarding the pie chart, with 50% of the expenditure, salaries are double the percentage of all others categories in total. Training and office expenses share an identical proportion 10%, meanwhile the projection for set-up cost is expected to be triple these figures.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-06 | akorn99 | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-07 | lili__nhnh | 72 | view |
| 2020-12-31 | PHAM ANH THU | 73 | view |
| 2018-08-15 | mary.ssherr | 84 | view |
| 2015-03-19 | Saeed2 | 58 | view |
- Traffic congestion is becoming increasingly problematic in major cities What solution can you suggest to solve the problems 67
- The diagram shows the process for labelling shellfish for the international market Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 89
- To some people studying the past is the best way to help young people function well in the modern world To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures could be effective in helping young people to function well in the modern world 84
- In recent years sports stars have become increasingly famous and wealthy For some this is a benefit raising the profile of sports but for others it is a negative influence Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The charts below show how selected age groups bought concert cinema and theatre tickets online over the first three months of 2013 in three countries and how the Internet was accessed 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'those moneys', 'those monies'?
Suggestion: this money; those moneys; those monies
...eanwhile, the pie chart illustrates how those money would be used in the beginning year. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, while, except for, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1314.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 269.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88475836431 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63481982973 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 106.607317073 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557620817844 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4843137147 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21247896018 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791057201162 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739458848383 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140037571483 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403777352991 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.