The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne

Essay topics:

The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne.

The table provides information about the trend of fast food consumed in Melbourne. From an overall perspective, it is evident that the largest number of processed food eaten throughout the years is hamburgers and fried chicken. Meanwhile, the largest increase will be experienced by salad.

In 2005, as many as 40 units of Hamburgers were consumed by people in Melbourne, slightly decreasing to about 38 units in present days and it is predicted that the figure will rise to about 51 units in 2025. Friend chicken consumption, however, did not experience a downward trend. It was commenced at 35 units in the first reported year, rising by 2 units at present, and will reach 45 units in the following four years. Although the salad (5 units) was the least favorite fast food in Melbourne in 2005, the figure of the salad consumed then thrice in present days and will peak at 41 units in 2025.

In addition, the number of units of fried rice and noodles eaten in 2005 was similar (6 units each). In today's world, the number of units of fried rice and noodle eaten was 9 and 8 units respectively. In the final year, it is foreseen that the figures for both these processed foods will be 9 units each.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-07-22 thaotanya 84 view
2024-07-14 dorae 73 view
2024-07-04 nobitaa 73 view
2024-07-04 nobitaa 73 view
2024-01-04 AhaanIshaan 11 view
Essays by user Wardiati Yusuf :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e eaten was 9 and 8 units respectively. In the final year, it is foreseen that the...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, then, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63849765258 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56472990662 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521126760563 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.804129274 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131049108189 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729216947952 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113932357927 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109160822566 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793679241012 0.0819641961636 97% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.